Hi Marguerite,
This is not the type of "green job" I want to create through President Obama's American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan.
Click here to take action or read on to get the full story.
The big coal companies want to build factories -- factories that can cook coal at nearly 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit, producing black, gunky coal tars that they can process into liquid fuels for war planes.
During the process, they'd release far more climate-changing greenhouse emissions than an oil company would to drill, refine and transport an equivalent amount of petroleum.
And they want you and me to pay for it.
That's right, industry lobbyists have conspired with a few key members of the U.S. Senate to tack on $50 billion in loan guarantees to the president's recovery plan -- $50 billion that, instead of creating green jobs building wind turbines, or installing solar roofs, or weatherizing homes and other buildings, would subsidize things like coal liquefaction and nuclear power plant construction.
What am I missing? Didn't we just work like crazy to elect a pro-environment majority to set a course for the cleaner, greener energy economy of the future? Why on earth would we want to subsidize not-so-clean coal, especially if doing so accelerates global warming?
That's not the green recovery we've been fighting for. And that's why I'm hoping you'll join me and thousands of our friends and supporters in calling on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to keep President Obama's recovery bill clean and green.
Click here to make your voice heard.
As you might have already guessed, this $50 billion giveaway is buried in the fine print of the Senate's version of the recovery plan, the better to avoid public scrutiny.
Fortunately, our friends on Capitol Hill tipped us off, and now you can help us scrub the recovery bill clean of this dirty provision.
Click here to tell Sen. Reid to take action today.
http://www.
Thanks for making it all possible.
Winston VaughanField Organizer
Environment Massachusetts
WinstonV@
http://www.
July 2004 December 2004 August 2005 March 2006 May 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 January 2008 February 2008 June 2008 July 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009